sheesh
2008-02-24 5:02 p.m.
well well. that's quite a response.
strange.
anyway. i'd like to point out i hadnt made any negative comments about jj, as you'd realize if you read my previous post carefully.
any accusations pointed at jj? nooo. sweeping statements about jj? nooo. name-calling jj? nooo.
anything ABOUT jj at all? nooo.
hence stand = neutral.
the purpose of my post was not to slam jj (i had, in fact, pointed out that only a minority of the tags were silly) but rather targetted at the TAGS.
and which tags? the logical ones? nooo. the SILLY ones.
it wasnt a personal attack because i afterall do not know any of the ppl who tagged. and some of them were under ALIASES furthermore.
i was merely commenting that the tags WERE silly and giving my appropriate rationale behind it. which u will realize, once again if you read carefully, WAS accurate.
so instead of getting all offended and spamming my tagboard, think about it. esp the taggers whom i didnt mention. what are you getting offended at? did i badmouth jj or you in any way? i mentioned that the majority of the jj population are intelligent, you should realize as well that the 2 taggers i targetted tagged inappropriate material.
so go and TELL THEM, and enough with the flooding already. go and do something better with your time.
taa!
